Smoking is responsible for one of every five deaths in the United States. Moreover, it is the single most important preventable cause of death in our society. (l,l0)
More black Americans smoke cigarettes, over other tobacco products, than their white counterparts. Although the smoking rate for blacks is higher than for white smokers, black smokers smoke fewer cigarettes per day. Black smokers suffer from a higher incidence of smoking-related illnesses than white smokers.
The following summarizes the most recent smoking information for African Americans in the United States
Recent studies demonstrate that cigarette smoking behaviors vary by race and by sex.
Cigarettes are the most popular tobacco product among blacks, as they are among the general population. However, blacks do use other forms of tobacco. (3)
The prevalence for pipe smoking is the same for black and white men (3.4%).
More white men (5.6%) smoke cigars than do black men (4.0%).
Black men (3.4%) use chewing tobacco less than white men (4.2%).
More black women (1.7%) chew tobacco than white women (0.1 %).
White men use snuff at a rate of 3.3%, compared with a 1.1 % rate for black men.
Among black women, 2.2% use snuff whereas only 0.3% of white women use this product.
Smoking prevalence varies by occupational category. Smoking rates are
generally higher in male and female blue-collar workers than in their
white-collar counterparts. In 1987, 26.1 % of white collar men and 26.6%
of white collar women smoked cigarettes. Among blue-collar workers, 42.1 %
of men and 36.6% of women smoked during that year.(6) (Note: blacks of
both sexes are more concentrated in blue-collar occupations.)
The National Health Interview Survey 1978-1980 revealed a relationship
between smoking behavior and occupations. Among men, blue-collar workers
had considerably higher smoking rates than white-collar workers within
each racial group, and black male blue-collar workers exhibited the
highest smoking rate (52.1 %). Among black women, there was little
difference in smoking prevalence between occupations. However, among white
women, the expected white-collar, blue-collar, service worker differences
prevailed; blue-collar and service workers were more likely to smoke
(39.6% and 38.7%, respectively) than white collar workers (32.0%).(7)
Black workers are considerably less likely than their white counterparts to be heavy smokers (smoke 20 or more cigarettes daily). This trend holds true for all categories of workers and for men and women.(7)
Blacks experience excessive mortality for many tobacco-related cancers.
In 1988, nearly 48,000 black Americans died from smoking-attributable causes-these are deaths that could have been prevented.(10) (Table 3)
The rate of smoking-attributable deaths is higher among blacks than among whites (Table 4) .
Studies conducted by the Centers for Disease Control report that black
Americans have not only a higher death rate from cigarette smoking than do
whites, but have a greater loss of productive years of life.
Blacks tend to become ill from smoking at younger ages than do whites.(11)
In 1988, blacks lost an estimated 268,437 years of potential life to age 65
due to smoking. Whites lost an estimated 913,943 years.(10) (Note: The U.S.
Census reported that black Americans comprised 12% of the total population in
1990).
Although whites lost more years in total, the rate of smoking attributable
YPLL (before age 65 per 100,000 persons is greater than or equal to 35 years
age) for blacks (2,472) was twice that for whites (1,225). (10)
References
1. Office On Smoking and Health. Reducing the health
consequences of smoking: 25 years of progress. A report of the Surgeon
General. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Public Health Service, Office on Smoking and Health, 1989. DHHS publication
no. (CDC)89-8411.
2. Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration.
National Institute on Drug Abuse, National house-hold survey on drug abuse:
population estimates 1988. Washington, D.C.:U.S. Department Of Health and
Human Services, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health
Administration, 1989. DHHS publication no. (ADM)89-1636.
3. Schoenborn CA, Boyd G. Smoking and other tobacco use:
United States, 1987. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics, 1987.
DHHS publication no. (PHS)89-1591. (Vital and health statistics, series 10,
no. 169).
4. Office On Smoking and Health. Adult use of tobacco, 1986.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, Office on Smoking and Health, 1989. DHHS publication no. (OM)90-2004.
5. Centers for Disease Control. Cigarette brand use among
adult smokers-United States, 1986. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1990;
9:665, 671-673.
6. National Health Interview Survey, 287, Office on Smoking and Health, unpublished data.
7. Office On Smoking and Health. The health consequences
of smoking: cancer and chronic lung disease in the workplace. A report of the
Surgeon General. Washington, D.C.: U.S. apartment of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, Office on Smoking and Health, 1985. HHS
publication no. (PHS)85-50207.
8. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United
States, prevention profile 1989. Hyattsville, Maryland: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1990. DHHS publication no.
(PHS)90-1232.
9. National Institutes of Health. Cancer statistics review
1973-87, surveillance, epidemiology, and end results report (SEER), 1978-81.
Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, National Cancer Institute, 1990. NIH publication no. (NIH)90-2789.
10. Centers for Disease Control. Smoking-attributable
mortality and years of potential life lost-United States, 1988. Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report 1990; 40:62-71.
11. Centers for Disease Control. Smoking-attributable
mortality and years of potential life lost-United States, 1984. Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report 1987; 36:693-697.
12. Niswander KR, Gordon M. The women and their pregnancies.
The collaborative perinatal study of the National Institute of Neurological
Diseases and Stroke. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1972. DHEW
publication no. (NIH)73-379.
13. Mosher WD, Pratt, WF. Fecundity, infertility, and
reproductive health in the United States, 1982. Washington, D.C.: Public
Health Service, Government Printing Office, 1988. National Center for Health
Statistics, 1988. DHHS publication no. (PHS)88-1591. (Vital and Health
Statistics, series 2, no. 106).
14. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Monitoring the Future
Project, 1989, Office On Smoking and Health, unpublished data.
15. Office On Smoking and Health. The health benefits of
smoking cessation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, Office on Smoking and Health, 1990. DHHS
publication no.(CDC)90-8416.
16. Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Pierce JP, Hatziandrea EJ, Patel
KM, Davis RM Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States: the changing
influence of gender and race. Journal of the American Medical Association
1989; 261:49-55.
17. Davis, RM. Current trends in cigarette advertising and
marketing. New England Journal of Medicine 1987; 316:725-732.
18. Cummings KM, Giovino G, Mendicino AJ. Cigarette
advertising and racial differences in cigarette brand preference. Public
Health Reports 1987; 102:698-701.
19. Federal Trade Commission. Report to Congress for 1987
pursuant to the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act. Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Federal Trade Commission, 1989.
20. McMahon ET, Taylor PA. Citizens' action handbook on
alcohol and tobacco billboard advertising. Washington, D.C.: Center for
Science in the Public Interest, 1990.
21. Ramirez A. A cigarette campaign under fire. New York
Times. 1990 Jan 12: Dl,D4.
22. California Department of Health Services. Tobacco use in
California 1990: preliminary report documenting the decline of tobacco use.
San Diego: University of California, 1990.
23. Marcus M, Glick D, Lewis SD. Fighting ads in the inner
city: a grassroots baffle against 'minority marketing'. Newsweek. 1990 Feb
5:46.